Simply type 911 Mysteries into Google and you will get a whole page of options.
You can download this uncopyrighted film free of charge. Its about an hour and a half long, so its important to download the whole thing. Its excellent. If there were just 1 documentary I could recommend, it would be this one.

You could also try to buy it. Most of these documentarys are very low cost, as the producers are not in it for the money and just want to cover their costs. I have found others for $5.00 There is no copyright. You are free to download it and copy it. It says so on the disc. Hopefully this one will post.
Good luck.

It was given to me by a waitress.

Try here http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=911+mysteries&btnG=Google+Search

Its extremely good. Its worth getting. You should be able to download it for free, there is no copyright, as the producers want you to download it, copy it and see it.
It shows video footage from ground zero, that most people have never seen. The news networks were not the only ones video tapping the disaster. There is a lot of private footage out there.

As I stated 2 posts above, you can visit the journal of 911 studies and read about the research conducted on the molten steel samples obtained from all 3 WTC buildings. So dispite what the NIST report correctly points out about the WTC fires not getting hot enough to MELT steel, there was large quanties of molten steel at all 3 sites. In fact it remained molten for weeks, insulated under the rubble. So obviously there is a piece of the puzzle missing. The evidence leads experts to conclude that that missing piece of the puzzle is THERMATE. Good luck in obtaining the video.
Rob

On the Popular Mechanics site today 5/26/07, they state that although none of the fires at the WTC complex were hot enough to melt steel, it was hot enough to bend steel. This bent steel lead to the collapse of the towers.

Well, video footage clearly shows molten metal POURING out of the corner of one of the WTC towers. Critics have claimed that the molten metal seen in the video footage was instead molten aluminum from the aircraft, which has a lower melting point than steel. The problem with this claim is that molten aluminum is WHITE, not ORANGE. ORANGE molten metal was seen gushing from the building. Molten steel is ORANGE. Molten aluminum is WHITE. Their claim does not hold water scientifically.

And it gets worse. Melted steel samples were found at all 3 WTC wreckage sites. AND all melted steel samples contained thermate residue. Some have stated that this residue was caused by oxidation of aluminum, {from the planes} by fire. WTC 7 was not hit by any plane and the melted steel samples showed a similar level of residue.

PM also states that the intense heat at the WTC sites was also caused by burning rugs, paper and office furnature. What they fail to tell us is that these materials still do not burn hot enough to melt steel, or even hot enough to bend steel.
Folks, were are talking about science here. Steel does not melt at temps lower than 2700 F. Thats a fact, and facts don’t change.

If there was in fact melted steel at the bridge collapse disaster, then it is apparent that we are not getting the whole story. There is no mystery surrounding how steel melts. Experts have been melting steel for a very long time and they know what it takes to get it to melt. No open air hydrocarbon fire can melt steel. Its a simple scientific fact. Thermite and thermate however can easily melt steel outside a blast furnace. So whats this all tell us?

As for the rest of you, why the resistance toward largely proven theory of 911 being an inside job?

As I’ve said before, the governments official story rests in part on the NIST Report. One of the many major problems is that the NIST report does not support the governments story. The NIST report states, {page 35 I believe} that no WTC steel ever saw temps greater than 600 C, or roughly 1200 F. With a melting point of 2700F how could WTC Certified Steel possibly have melted? Thats the whole basis of the US governments theory. And it fails scientifically.
You see Truthers are not wackos. They are simply people who have taken the time to actually read this stuff and try to make sense out of it. You people really need to forget Rosie O’Donald. She is just repeating what experts in the field have found. If you want to know more, a good place to start is here http://journalof911studies.com/

Why not listen to what experts around the world have found instead. Experts such as physics professors, structural engineers and demolitions experts.
The governments account of the events of 911 only holds up if you are ignorant of the facts.

The whole truth and nothing but the truth can be found her […]

posted by pokeydonut at 9:59 P […]

It’s only teenage wasteland.

Just think, 50 percent of the American people believe
in UFO’s and angels. You don’t see more than the
occasional rah-rah convention, repetitive internet
ping pong, or small group with posters marching
around on those issues, either.

It’s more than 5 and a half years after 9/11. Apart
from the usual extremists worldwide, can you hear
the lack of interest in 9/11 mihop? There’s no
there there. Listen, it’s deafening…

Yeah, right, this note is a black bag op.

Reality check: ask yourself this, what would be harder,
planting a tanker full of WMD in a zillion square
miles of Iraqi desert, or setting up a few MIHOP
web sites to make the idiots in the White House
look like infallible geniuses?

Try “pimp slapping” yourself in the mirror, maybe
you’ll come to your senses.