The Inconvenient “Truth” about the Boston LiteBrite Bomb Scare
I think it’s pretty clear who is behind the LiteBrite faux-attack in Boston? Are you going to tell me that you believe the lies that the mainstream media is generating that the Cartoon Network is responsible for the simultaneous placing 24 “roadside bomb-like” devices around Boston without anyone seeing them? The Cartoon Network is only accepting responsibility because they are part of the TimeWarner Media Conglomerate which is controlled by the Bush family. This was probably part of the side-deal they cut with Bush’s FCC to buy Adelphia. (”You scratch my back, I’ll scratch yours.”)
Only someone with the resources of the U.S. government behind them could place all those LiteBrites(tm) without any police, security cameras, or witnesses of any kind recording them. Are you going to tell me one of the most synchronized deployments of electronics in Boston’s history was done by a marketing company for a cartoon promotion?
Bin Laden’s Likeness Flipping Off America
Isn’t it just a little bit of a coincidence that the Cartoon Network decides to do this “promotion” during the Libby Trial? What are they going to say that it’s sweeps month? And it just happens that they use a Bin Laden’s likeness doing a rude gesture? Sorry, but I don’t believe in coincidences. This has Cheney’s finger prints all over it.
And the videos of the guys putting up these videos are so obviously faked. Doesn’t the government understand that the people won’t be fooled again? Their story is already falling apart, now they say they worked for an NSA-sounding promotion company called Interference, Inc.
CIA Stooge who goes by the alias “Peter Berdovsky”. Notice how they dressed him to look like a terrorist? Since when do “marketing” people dress like terrorists? When they come from central casting that’s when. They must really think we’re stupid.
Next steps: Charlie Sheen and the 1/31 Truth Movement .
tags: cartoon network charlie sheen boston Aqua Teen Hunger Force
Similar Independent Sources posts:
- But What Did They Think Of The New Weezer Release?: "Al-Qaeda sympathizers are using Orkut, a popular, worldwide Internet service owned by Google, to rally support for Osama bin Laden, share videos and ...
- Another Conspiracy Theory Bites the Dust: While certainly not as widely-held as the nutty beliefs revolving 9/11, fluoride in the water, or the Illuminati, there has been a belief in certain c ...
- Charlie Sheen Says 9/11 is a fraud so it must be so: It appears that some in the left are so upset about the war on terror being a Republican issue that instead of making the Dems strong on domestic de ...
- Later, He Actually Used A WiFi Network!: The Los Angeles Times reveals that network news anchor Brian Williams has astonishing skills: The (Katrina) story also showcased Williams' technologi ...
- Conspiracy Theory’s Charlie Sheen Tells Ex to “Die of Cancer”; Wife responds “I don’t want Charlie’s prostitute-tranny-infested sperm”: 9/11 conspiracy theory advocate Charlie Sheen is in the news again, this time for telling his ex-wife, Denise Richards, to "die of cancer". Richard ...
February 2nd, 2007 at 8:09 am
Everyone keeps saying the LED signs didn’t “look” like a bomb, but how many of you have seen a real bomb? Do you have any idea, aside from what you’ve seen on t.v., how a bomb looks or could can look like? Stop being so ignorant! The police may have overreacted but i’d rather they overreact than make nothing. It may have been a false alarm but it was an eye opener. I’d like to know how many of you saw an LED sign and then touched or removed it? Well, why not? Open your eyes and realize that terrorist and people who wish to do us harm have creative imaginations. They are not going to make a bomb and then write “bomb” all over it.
April 27th, 2007 at 4:06 am
[…] enken dat we worden aangevallen door terroristen. In plaats van aliens. (Denk even aan die LiteBrite-actie in Boston - een leuke promotieactie wordt begrepen […]