<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Independent Sources&#8217; list of  unnecessary redundancies repeated more than once</title>
	<atom:link href="http://independentsources.com/2006/11/13/redundancies-oxymorons/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://independentsources.com/2006/11/13/redundancies-oxymorons/</link>
	<description>Independent thinking about  California Politics, Hot Bikini Clad Teachers (Erica Chevillar), Topless Teachers (Tamara Hoover), Hot French Newscaster Melissa Theuriau, Katie Rees  &#038; the LA Times</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 12:17:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Insider</title>
		<link>http://independentsources.com/2006/11/13/redundancies-oxymorons/comment-page-1/#comment-38132</link>
		<dc:creator>Insider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 20:40:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://independentsources.com/?p=1891#comment-38132</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll give you this. You&#039;ve thought it through more than most but I still think it&#039;s redundant. 

BTW, I just google searched and over 1.4 million results came up with the vast majority being unnecessary redundancies.  Does that explanation clear it up?

Can you count the number of redundancies that I intentionallly included on purpose?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll give you this. You&#8217;ve thought it through more than most but I still think it&#8217;s redundant. </p>
<p>BTW, I just google searched and over 1.4 million results came up with the vast majority being unnecessary redundancies.  Does that explanation clear it up?</p>
<p>Can you count the number of redundancies that I intentionallly included on purpose?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://independentsources.com/2006/11/13/redundancies-oxymorons/comment-page-1/#comment-38123</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 18:59:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://independentsources.com/?p=1891#comment-38123</guid>
		<description>Consider this: someone is throwing you a surprise party. You have become aware of the fact that the surprise party is going to be thrown, however, you do not know when it will be thrown. When you arrived at the party, would it not be an &quot;expected surprise&quot;? Hence, the opposite is an unexpected surprise, of course.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Consider this: someone is throwing you a surprise party. You have become aware of the fact that the surprise party is going to be thrown, however, you do not know when it will be thrown. When you arrived at the party, would it not be an &#8220;expected surprise&#8221;? Hence, the opposite is an unexpected surprise, of course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Stevo in H-Town</title>
		<link>http://independentsources.com/2006/11/13/redundancies-oxymorons/comment-page-1/#comment-36779</link>
		<dc:creator>The Stevo in H-Town</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Nov 2006 15:27:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://independentsources.com/?p=1891#comment-36779</guid>
		<description>Bill Lalor....
My favrit.....&quot;orientated&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill Lalor&#8230;.<br />
My favrit&#8230;..&#8221;orientated&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Stevo in H-Town</title>
		<link>http://independentsources.com/2006/11/13/redundancies-oxymorons/comment-page-1/#comment-36637</link>
		<dc:creator>The Stevo in H-Town</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 16:51:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://independentsources.com/?p=1891#comment-36637</guid>
		<description>I know I&#039;m missin&#039; an opprtunity for a &quot;funny joke&quot; here somewhere...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know I&#8217;m missin&#8217; an opprtunity for a &#8220;funny joke&#8221; here somewhere&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Insider</title>
		<link>http://independentsources.com/2006/11/13/redundancies-oxymorons/comment-page-1/#comment-36269</link>
		<dc:creator>Insider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2006 18:07:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://independentsources.com/?p=1891#comment-36269</guid>
		<description>Particularly lists of things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Particularly lists of things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crassius Maximus</title>
		<link>http://independentsources.com/2006/11/13/redundancies-oxymorons/comment-page-1/#comment-36268</link>
		<dc:creator>Crassius Maximus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2006 17:50:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://independentsources.com/?p=1891#comment-36268</guid>
		<description>One thing is certain: People love lists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing is certain: People love lists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Insider</title>
		<link>http://independentsources.com/2006/11/13/redundancies-oxymorons/comment-page-1/#comment-36230</link>
		<dc:creator>Insider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2006 06:47:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://independentsources.com/?p=1891#comment-36230</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m also thinking &quot;individual packet&quot; is redundant and in fact &quot;individual&quot; in front of almost any noun is probably unnecessarily wordy. Wait, that&#039;s redundant too since I could just have said &quot;wordy&quot;. When is being wordy &quot;necessary&quot;? Damn this is hard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m also thinking &#8220;individual packet&#8221; is redundant and in fact &#8220;individual&#8221; in front of almost any noun is probably unnecessarily wordy. Wait, that&#8217;s redundant too since I could just have said &#8220;wordy&#8221;. When is being wordy &#8220;necessary&#8221;? Damn this is hard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Insider</title>
		<link>http://independentsources.com/2006/11/13/redundancies-oxymorons/comment-page-1/#comment-36229</link>
		<dc:creator>Insider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2006 06:34:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://independentsources.com/?p=1891#comment-36229</guid>
		<description>Independent Consultant?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Independent Consultant?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Lalor</title>
		<link>http://independentsources.com/2006/11/13/redundancies-oxymorons/comment-page-1/#comment-36204</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Lalor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2006 02:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://independentsources.com/?p=1891#comment-36204</guid>
		<description>You missed the Department of Redundancy Department. 

I&#039;m working on my own lists: made up words(eg &quot;irregardless&quot;; &quot;acclimitated&quot;);  and often confused/misused words (wary/weary).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You missed the Department of Redundancy Department. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m working on my own lists: made up words(eg &#8220;irregardless&#8221;; &#8220;acclimitated&#8221;);  and often confused/misused words (wary/weary).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Insider</title>
		<link>http://independentsources.com/2006/11/13/redundancies-oxymorons/comment-page-1/#comment-36199</link>
		<dc:creator>Insider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 22:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://independentsources.com/?p=1891#comment-36199</guid>
		<description>Murdered to death.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Murdered to death.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bucky O'Grog</title>
		<link>http://independentsources.com/2006/11/13/redundancies-oxymorons/comment-page-1/#comment-36180</link>
		<dc:creator>Bucky O'Grog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 18:32:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://independentsources.com/?p=1891#comment-36180</guid>
		<description>stinky turd</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>stinky turd</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Independent Sources  &#187; Blog Archive   &#187; The top 10 unintentionally worst company URLs</title>
		<link>http://independentsources.com/2006/11/13/redundancies-oxymorons/comment-page-1/#comment-36166</link>
		<dc:creator>Independent Sources  &#187; Blog Archive   &#187; The top 10 unintentionally worst company URLs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 16:02:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://independentsources.com/?p=1891#comment-36166</guid>
		<description>[...] 5/adults-on-myspace/&quot;&gt; &#8220;Oh no! Mom and Dad are on MySpace again!&#8221; 	Update: Independent Sources’ list of unnecessary redundancies repeated more than once  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 5/adults-on-myspace/&#8221;&gt; &#8220;Oh no! Mom and Dad are on MySpace again!&#8221; 	Update: Independent Sources’ list of unnecessary redundancies repeated more than once  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robb Allen</title>
		<link>http://independentsources.com/2006/11/13/redundancies-oxymorons/comment-page-1/#comment-36165</link>
		<dc:creator>Robb Allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 15:59:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://independentsources.com/?p=1891#comment-36165</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve seen various permutations of &quot;lethal fatality&quot; in news stories. Trying to remember what they were...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve seen various permutations of &#8220;lethal fatality&#8221; in news stories. Trying to remember what they were&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
