Think OJ is innocent? Okay, trick question, no one with a brain does. But read on…
What in the world went wrong at the criminal trial? Why did the civil case go the other way? These and many, many other questions are answered in detail at Patterico’s blog in a 6-part series starting here.
My favorite is part six which includes plaintiff attorney Daniel Petrocelli’s final argument to the jury. A must read.
tags: oj
Similar Independent Sources posts:
- Another Jury Failure: Scrushy Acquitted of Fraud at HealthSouth: In another stunning example of the fallibility of juries, HealthSouth Corp. founder Richard Scrushy walked away a free man Tuesday after a jury cleare ...
- Lawsuit Abuse: Get out the barf bags: First read this horribly one-sided article from the Los Angeles Times. Next read this: Grace Fuller claims that she suffered two epileptic seizures be ...
- Weekend Edition: “Guilty as Sin, Free as a Bird:” Michael Jackson Jury Weak, Corrupt and Immoral: Which is more despicable: a supposedly impartial jury being too-biased to convict a repeat pedophiliac or being too-intimidated to do so? Wi ...
- Don’t think we need legal reform? Dry Cleaning “Suit” Should Change Your Mind: Man files $67 million lawsuit for a lost pair of pants. Targets Korean Immigrants Just Trying to Make a Living. The really, really scary thing is that ...
- Krugmania: Like any sane person we here at Independent Sources enjoy picking apart the columns of Paul Krugman, but pleasurable activities can be pursued to the ...
August 29th, 2006 at 9:37 am
David Markland: [IMG http://blogging.la/archives/images/2006/08/875BUNDY-thumb.jpgLA County Prosecutor “Patterico” is blogging a series of “Ruminations” on why he believes OJ Simpson got away with murder (h/t Independent Sources). Its pretty straightforward stuff, which underlines his core belief: I call it the Microscope Effect. If you put anything under a microscope, you can come out with the wildest theories. The series, now on part seven, acknowledges that the Prosecution