CNN back up to their old tricks
Remember Eason Jordan’s 2003 admission that CNN had withheld information about conditions in Iraq in order to protect employees and maintain access? Never mind that CNN’s cooperation presented a distorted view of the actual conditions in Iraq, it was more important to have a story rather than a true story. That decision ultimately cost Jordan his job.
Three years later the Jordan doctrine appears to be popping up again in CNN’s coverage of the Israeli-Hezbollah knife fight. Nic Robertson reported on civilian casualties in a July 18th piece which showed Israel hitting targets with no military value. Newsbusters reports that on the 23rd he added a number of caveats to the story:
Challenged by Reliable Sources host (and Washington Post media writer) Howard Kurtz on Sunday, Robertson suggested Hezbollah has “very, very sophisticated and slick media operations,” that the terrorist group “had control of the situation. They designated the places that we went to, and we certainly didn’t have time to go into the houses or lift up the rubble to see what was underneath,” and he even contradicted Hezbollah’s self-serving spin: “There’s no doubt that the [Israeli] bombs there are hitting Hezbollah facilities.”
But the closest Robertson came to making any of these points in the taped package that aired last week was admitting that “we [he and his CNN crew] didn’t go burrowing into all the houses,” after pointing out (for the second time) that “we didn’t see any military type of equipment” in the area Hezbollah chose to let them tour.
Five days later, Robertson argued that “journalistic integrity” required skepticism: “When you hear their [Hezbollah’s] claims, they have to come with more than a grain of salt, that you have to put in some journalistic integrity. That you have to point out to the audience and let them know that this was a guided tour by Hezbollah press officials along with their security, that it was a very rushed affair.”
Compare that with Carl Cameron of Fox News who this morning states:
(paraphrased) “Hezbollah has asked that we don’t show where they are firing missles from. Out of concern for our safety we are complying.”
That leaves no doubt in the viewers mind that some context is distorted / missing.
Similar Independent Sources posts:
- OK Maybe Hezbollah isn’t so bad: Joking people. If Iran and Hezbollah had their way she'd be in a burkah. (And boy would Jack Bauer be pissed off) h/t Ace Lebanon, Israel, ...
- Breast implants saves woman after Hezbollah attack - US Military mandates for all service members: BREITBART.COM - Breast implants saves woman after Hezbollah attack Still stinging from rebukes over the shortage of body armor and up armored HumVe ...
- Breaking from the scrip: 84 of Hollywood’s A-List Speak Out Publicly Against Hamas and Hezbollah (and it’s about time): These efforts sometimes ring hollow but given who is saying what, this notable. Nicole Kidman has made a public stand against terrorism. So ...
- Photos of Beirut Airport After Targeted Bombing: For those of you interested in such things, this is an excerpt of an email going around discussing the damage that the Israeli military is inflict ...
- OK, I am on Israel’s side again. IDF Babes: Update: More pictures at Israeli Military Forum It's almost enough to make me become Jewish and move to Israel. (but then Mel Gibson would hate ...










August 4th, 2006 at 6:09 am
HAY GEORGE U CAN DO SO MUCH BETTER IM 14 AND IT WILL BE MY FIRSTGAY TIME WITH U