Congress to Accidentally Ban (Some) Teen Bloggers?
Kids and young teens won’t be able to use school or library computers to access MySpace — or much of anything else, if recently introduced legislation is passed by Congress. According to Business Week, the Deleting Online Predators Act (DOPA) (full text here) will prevent kids at school and library public computers from accessing any site that
allow(s) “users to create Web pages or profiles that provide information about themselves and are available to other users” and offer “a mechanism of communication with other users, such as a forum, chat room, e-mail, or instant messenger.”
That could rule out content from any number of Internet companies, including Yahoo! (YHOO) and Google (GOOG). What’s more, DOPA would prohibit sites that enable users to create their own content and share it. That covers a wide swath of the online world, known colloquially as Web 2.0, where users actively create everything from blogs to videos to news-page collections.
Basically any sites with two-way communication would be banned unless it was almost certain a kid would not come into contact with anything “harmful to minors.”
This is overreaching. If the kids are old enough to use the school or library computer without supervision, they’re old enough for their parents to have explained how to be careful online. They already know not to talk to strangers in trenchcoats. They need to use the same care on the internet.
Kids also clearly need to be taught not to put personally identifiable information online.
But is limiting access at these public computers going to do anything but create hassles for the people who manage them? If a kid doesn’t have access to their own computer, they’ll get around the ban by using a friend’s computer instead. And they’ll soon (if they aren’t already) be accessing MySpace on their cell phone. Meanwhile, librarians will be checking ID to see if someone’s old enough to IM.
Filtering software? OK. Education programs? Yes. But ban access to two-way communication? Too far for too little.
If you agree, you can contact Congressman Fitzpatrick here.
—
Apparently just having become aware of 50 million member MySpace, DOPA sponsor Congressman Michael Fitzpatrick (R-PA) may have never heard of Web 2.0 at all. One East Coast VC did a reality check and found
I asked a bunch of local (Philly-area) acquaintances and the answer came back loud and clear: none – nada – zip. People here have barely heard of Myspace and Craigslist – let alone any of the ‘hot’ Web 2.0 companies.
(h/t: Good Morning Silicon Valley)
Technorati Tags: Web 2.0
Similar Independent Sources posts:
- Oh no! Mom and Dad are on MySpace again!: It must be a teen's worst nightmare. Finding out that while Dad said he was researching stocks and mom was supposedly filing recipes, they were actual ...
- Adult pols trolling MySpace for young…..voters; Still creepy: WSJ reports (may require fee) that politicians such as U.S. Rep Ted Strickland are increasingly creating MySpace profiles to attract young voters. Gi ...
- If You Don’t Have Something Nice To Say About Someone … You’ll Go To Jail?: Does a new federal law make it illegal to annoy someone via a posting on the web? At best, there is sloppy drafting in new legislation covering harass ...
- MySpace for Catholics? Finding Soul Mates Online: BusinessWeek online reports that a nun (or more correctly Sister Judith Zoebelein, the editorial director of the Internet Office of the Holy See) in t ...
- Off Topic: Online Privacy News: Two news items that are off our main topic, but feed our obsession with online privacy: 1) Michelle Malkin blogs about how people are accidentally sha ...

May 12th, 2006 at 7:54 pm
It’s scary to think that Republicans think that children in school should only be allowed to access static web pages uploaded via FTP and without comments enabled.
May 12th, 2006 at 8:41 pm
I just read the act. As I read it it would not ban access to all chat rooms etc. but to those that were determined to allow easy access to objectionable material. If I read it correctly there would be a commission to determine what sites those were. What is more disturbing to me is that even though these measure are routinely struck down by the courts congress keeps passing them. it is also disturbing that the business week article attempts to present the idea that adult access to these sites will be limited when, from what I can read that is not the case. This law if it passes is almost certain to be struck down as a 1st amendment restriction.
Of course I could be completely wrong too.