Netflix vs. Blockbuster: How to lose $35,000 following a stock analyst’s advice
Many years ago I learned to treat stock analysts reports with more than a grain of salt. In case you haven’t yet reached that same conclusion you might want to read this blog posting which details how poorly Wedbush Morgan analyst Michael Pachter projections on Netflix and Blockbuster video played out over a period of one year. In fact it is hard to imagine how someone could be so incredibly wrong. Not to pick on the guy for a set of projections horribly wrong but the degree he was off is simply stunning.
In short analyst Pachter predicted the following would result over the 12-month period starting April 2005:
Netflix (NFLX) would drop from $11.20 to $3.00
Blockbuster Video (BBI) would increase from $9.96 to $13.00
Based on this information (from a professional stock analyst no less) someone might have decided to short Netflix and buy Blockbuster. For almost no money (in fact shorting 1,000 Netflix shares would have brought more money than buying the 1,000 Blockbuster shares) this would have been an easy trade to do and your expected profit would be $11,240. But I pitty the fool who followed Pachter’s advice.
Here is reality:
Netflix (NFLX) would drop increased from $11.20 to $3.00 to $29.64
Blockbuster Video (BBL) would increase decreased from $9.96 to $13.00 to $4.79
Instead of making $11,240 you would have lost $23,610, a difference of $34,850!
Of course this simplistic view assumes the nominal trading costs associated with buying/selling/shorting and that the buyer/seller wouldn’t have woken up 6 months into this figuring out that Pachter in reality had no clue as to where these stocks were going. However even Pachter didn’t figure it out and over the 12 months adjusted his price targets of one or the other 5 times and still didn’t get it right so you could imagine him saying “hold the course, it will turn.” No it didn’t!
This posting isn’t about picking on or singling out Pachter or Wedbush Morgan but instead to highlight the dangers of following their advice. Analysts tend to be too close (where they can’t see the forest through the trees) or too far away (where their advice is no better than what one can get reading the WSJ) from their subjects. They can write insightful positioning papers and analyze the challenges that companies or sectors may face. However when they attempt to distill all of the complexity inherent with a stock price down into price targets one can see that they are no better than a monkey with a dart board. In fact, the monkeys would have kicked their ass this time around.
Note: we received an unsolicited email from Davis Freeberg promoting the article (see we do read our mail) linked above which resulted in this posting and did indeed find it a worthy read and believe you will as well. Pachter responded to Freeberg and you can read what he had to say in response.
Similar Independent Sources posts:
- Blockbuster Missed Chance to Buy Netflix: According to Hacking Netflix, a new Variety story titled "Blockbusted" has a former executive admitting: We had the option to buy Netflix for$50 milli ...
- Weekend Edition: iPod Shuffle 2GB/4GB Accidentally Exposed? Or Brilliant Marketing?: A few months ago, Netflix got a tremendous amount of press when a "Netflix Player" link was briefly exposed on the Netflix website. But was it really ...
- Netflix Player “Exposed”: Boo-Boo or Brilliant Marketing?: Some sharp-eyed Netflix users and attentive bloggers possibly got an unexpected look at the future of Netflix. According to HackingNetflix.com, A tech ...
- Are Speculators Selling Off Oil Stocks?: Floyd Norris in the has an article in the New York Times Business Section entitled "The Beginning of the End for High Oil Prices" in which he speculat ...
- Keyword Search: Gadzillion!: Google’s Shares Top $300 I know that we are not a stock board. If we were we’d have things like this: You shorts are in trouble wait for t ...

May 1st, 2006 at 9:50 pm
think he will continue to be wrong. However, I never question his conviction nor his consistency. Update #2 – Slashdot has weighed in on the debate between Blockbuster & Netflix and Independent Insiderruns the math on what it would have cost you if you would have shorted 1,000 shares of Netflix and purchased Blockbuster instead.
May 1st, 2006 at 9:50 pm
think he will continue to be wrong. However, I never question his conviction nor his consistency. Update #2 – Slashdot has weighed in on the debate between Blockbuster & Netflix and Independent Insiderruns the math on what it would have cost you if you would have shorted 1,000 shares of Netflix and purchased Blockbuster instead.
May 3rd, 2006 at 11:04 pm
Netflix vs. Blockbuster: How to lose $35,000 following a stock analyst’s advice
May 7th, 2006 at 12:28 pm
or indirectly benefit their brokerage. You are not paying stock analysts, they are not working for you. If you think an analyst is going to report on stock movement motivated by altruism and social justice you are going to lose your capital. ReadNetflix vs Blockbuster: How to Lose $35,000 for a sample of why you should have very little confidence in Talking Heads and instead rely on your own due diligence before making day trades. Or any trades.
May 14th, 2006 at 6:27 pm
[...] > cool article on how to rely on your intution …..
source: http://independentsources.com/2006/05/01/1400/
Many years ago I learned to tr [...]
June 11th, 2006 at 10:46 pm
[...] on
May 4th with stocks: BBI, NFLX · Davis Freeberg submits: A year ago, Independent Sources ? Blog Archive ? Netflix vs. Blockbuster: How Netflix vs. Blockbuster: How to [...]