Man dies after being screwed over entire life
Some people are just destined to never get a break. After spending 12 years in jail for a crime he did not commit, Dan Young Jr., 45, was killed in a hit and run accident.
“He always wanted to talk about his new life and what he would do once he got his clemency money,” his attorney, Kathleen Zellner, said after learning of Young’s death. “He wanted to know if I would help him get a red brick house.”
However in the end he was just pretty much screwed. If it wasn’t one thing (imprisonment) it was another (hit and run). If there is a lesson in this I’m not sure what it is other than to consider yourself lucky that you’re not Dan Young Jr., otherwise you’d be screwed too.
Similar Independent Sources posts:
- Weekend Edition: Preschool — It’s a Jungle: A new study says that for girls, preschool can be a lot like high school. The AP reports:"Meanness in girls can start when they still are toddlers, a ...
- Steve Jobs Gets a Rare Facial: Apple's Steve Jobs offers to give OSX away FREE for the One Laptop Per Child project laptop project but is rebuffed. Instead the project will go w ...
- Blink! How to lose 6 hours listening to one lame-ass book-on-tape: "The Tipping Point" author Malcolm Gladwell grew his hair long and found himself being hassled by cops, getting more speeding tickets and generally be ...
- Dear Dad…: A father passing by his son's bedroom was astonished to see the bed nicely made up and everything neat and tidy. Then he saw an envelope propped up ...
- Kid sits during Pledge. Gets teased. Sues. ACLU behind it all.: A 17-year old student wants to stand out and be noticed. He does this by sitting while others stand during the Pledge of Allegiance. Other students te ...










April 30th, 2006 at 5:40 am
I have two thoughts on this. First this sounds like the episode of the Simpsons where Homer meets the “World’s Hardest Working Man”, Ed Grimes (Grimey to his friends). Second, and more seriously, why is the lack of DNA evidence considered exonerating in this case and not in the current Duke University rape case?
(And no this is not an opinion on the actula guilt or evidence of the Duke lacrosse players, just a musing)