STLLATB (Save the Leftist Los Angeles Times Blogger)
What to do about Michael Hiltzik?
I hope that as editors at the Los Angeles Times ponder that question, they are able to isolate Hiltzik’s act from the medium, and not retreat from their (limited) efforts to a create more interactive news organization.
Hiltzik’s self-promoting pseudonymous comments crossed a line — but as his angry anti-Patterico screed this morning showed, it’s one he must not be able to see.
The fact that he hacked into co-worker’s email accounts, though over a decade old, is relevant since it reinforces the notion that he’s a loose canon.
A Times staffer once described Hiltzik to me; I can’t quote verbatim, but I’m fairly certain the words “smart,” “arrogant,” and “a**hole” were all in close proximity.
Those aren’t bad things for a blogger. But mixed in with what seems to be a win-at-any-cost mentality, it points to the need for closer supervision — probably not what Hiltzik got while writing his blog. LAT management bears some — not much, but some — of the blame for this little fiasco.
What shouldn’t be blamed, even unconsciously, is the medium. It would be easy for the LAT to learn the “lesson” that reporters or columnists can’t be trusted with blogs.
I hope they go the other way. While I don’t enjoy Hiltzik’s blog — too self-righteous, too ad-hominem, and too venomous — the LAT should let more staffers blog, not less.
If the LAT is concerned about a hit to its reputation, I think that’s overblown. Blogs are continuous op-ed pieces; and just like op-eds, the public associates them with the writer, not the paper that contains them. Hiltzik has embarrassed himself, not the LAT.
So — what to do about Hiltzik? Reinstate the blog. Let him bloviate. Let us find fault.
But please find more, and more interesting, in-house bloggers.
Please.
—
Other thoughts by Patterico and Armed Liberal at Winds of Change.
—
Our week o’ Hiltzik:
The comments that started it all are by nofanofcablecos here.
Our other posts on the Hiltzik affair in chronological order:
- Selective Comment Moderation at Michael Hiltzik’s Golden State Blog?
- Did We Violate Our Privacy Policy When We Outed Commenter “NoFanOfCableCos?”
- Michael Hiltzik’s big bad week in the blogosphere
- Los Angeles Times Suspends Hiltzik’s Blog for Ethics Violations
- Michael Hiltzik’s Other User ID’s
Technorati Tags: Hiltzik, LA Times, LAT, Los Angeles Times, Michael Hiltzik
Similar Independent Sources posts:
- You won’t believe this: Another Times Employee Leaving Easily Traceable “Anonymous” Comments: LA Times employee follows Michael Hiltzik's foolish footsteps and fails to erase them as well A commenter called "Masha" left this nice message on Pat ...
- Another Brick In The Wall …: In his post last week exposing the Los Angeles Times' Michael Hiltzik as a self promoting sock pupeteer, Patterico noted that "Mikekoshi," one of Hilt ...
- Nofanofcablecos gets his LA Times column back; the return of Michael Hiltzik: For us it started as a comment to this Independent Sources post, and the comment "Boy, you guys are stupid." It was signed Nofanofcablecos. After a li ...
- Selective Comment Moderation at Michael Hiltzik’s Golden State Blog?: Is the Los Angeles Times' Michael Hiltzik censoring Patterico (here, here)? Or just not allowing links in comments? Check back tomorrow for the answer ...
- From Hiltzik to Unhinged in One Degree of Separation: After visitors to Amazon.com view Michael Hiltzik's recent book "The Plot Against Social Security : How the Bush Plan Is Endangering Our Financial Fut ...

April 21st, 2006 at 6:48 pm
[...] blogging policy, but his blog is back up…thanks Independent Sources, where there is also this great comment: “What shouldn’t be blamed, eve [...]
April 22nd, 2006 at 9:21 pm
. Insider and Senior Administration Official have had some really good stuff lately, starting with the Charlie Sheen conspiracy post and it’s follow-ups, and running up through the entire Michael Hitzik scandal (also here, here, here, here, here,here, here, here, here, and here). Full Disclosure I have posted on Independent Sources, but not on these two subjects. I will be working on a conspiracy post with Insider and SAO soon. Not that the amount of traffic I get here will seriously impact their