Game Theory Applied to Toilet Seat Up/Down Dilema
Economists have tackled a question that has dogged heteronormative couples since the advent of indoor plumbing: should the toilet seat be left up or down after use?
Fortunately for us, the world of economics has tools for tackling issues like this and it turns out none is better than game theory.
Using the aptly labeled #1 and #2 for the different uses of a toilet and putting things in terms of “average costs” (which economists love to do), the scientists were able to calculate the male’s average cost of seat position transfer:
B = 2p(1-p)C
Just take it on faith and this is where game theory comes in. There are two possible strategies:
Strategy J:
Each person retains the default strategy that they used before cohabiting. This strategy is proposed by the man with the argument “Why does it matter if the seat is up or down?”. Working through the math will show that this strategy benefits the man.
Strategy M:
Each person leaves the seat down. This strategy is proposed by the female with the argument “It ought to be down.” You don’t need to be an economist to see that this strategy benefits the woman.
If the couple agree that the mutual goal should be to equalize the respective incremental costs then a quick mathematical analysis shows that can be achieved if the male leaves the seat up after performing toilet operation #1 with a frequency of:
f = (2p-1)/p
Which leads to the following optimal strategy:
In the morning the male should leave the seat up after performing #1 and in the evening he should put it down.
So now you know.
h/t: Marginal Revolution
Similar Independent Sources posts:
- France, Cycling
SuperpowerPowerAlso-Ran: Here's a look at Tour de France performance through stage five by country of origin, for countries with over five riders: I put this forth not to emph ... - Smart Women Don’t Get Married: According to a British study, the higher the IQ that a woman has, the less likely that she will be married. This makes intuitive sense to us but looki ...
- A Case For HSA’s: It is no secret that health costs have spiraled out of control for years to the point that it has become a significant drain on the country's economy, ...
- Amtrak: Taking Taxpayers for a Ride: Over the past 30 years, taxpayers have pumped over $30 billion into subsidizing Amtrak--a system that was supposed to be self-sustaining by the early ...
- “That Hissing Sound You Hear” is Paul Krugman Running Out of Ways to Denigrate the Recovery: From Paul Krugman's NYT op-ed "That Hissing Sound": "The economic recovery since 2001 has been disappointing in many ways, but it wouldn't have h ...

February 23rd, 2006 at 9:50 pm
You always need to put the seat down after use, unless you want the dog to drink out of the toilet. That is not a good example for my 4-year-old.
February 23rd, 2006 at 10:14 pm
You are right. If you see the full report you’ll see that they decided to simplify the analysis by ignoring both the “drinking out of the toilet” issue as well as the “midnight surprise” issue when a women mistakenly thinks the seat is down when sitting down in the dark.
September 28th, 2006 at 12:36 am
[...] (In reply to Rid Skwerr) I do hope you are not bringing proper mathematics into this…
http://independentsources.com/2006/02/21/game-theory-appli [...]