LA Water: Filled with Irony and other Pollutants
Los Angeles City Controller Laura Chick recently discovered that LA’s Department of Water and Power spent nearly $90,000 on bottled water over the past two years during a period where they spent one million dollars promoting DWP’s water as “top quality.”
The message learned from this is that LA’s water is good enough for us little people (e.g., rate payers) but certainly not good enough for public servants. While some of the purchases can be explained for reasons other than just staying away from stinky brown tap water, it is clear that DWP has never heard the expression about the importance of “eating one’s own dog food.”
If LA’s officials need bottled water, why aren’t they drinking their own “top quality” water? I’ll tell you why, no one likes to look into a bottle and see little things swirling around, which is exactly what happens when you fill a clear glass with LA tap. That’s why people, in general, don’t drink from aquariums or stagnant ponds. Chick’s report showed that despite having 25,000 bottles on hand of LA tap, officials repeated turned to Sparkletts.
Doug Heller, executive director of the Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights, had this to say about DWP management spending ratepayer dollars on water for their employees from an outside supplier:
“It strickes me as ironic that the city spends money touting the safety of its water to dring but won’t drink it themselves.”
In our view it’s not ironic, it’s hypocritical.
(full story: Los Angeles Times)
Update: I found the following off of DWP’s own website so maybe it’s time we all switched to bottled water.
Some ongoing preliminary research suggests a small reproductive health risk from certain Disinfection
By-Products (DBPs) found in drinking water. DBPs are regulated contaminants, and LADWP currently
meets all the standards for them.
In my book “Top Quality” does not include DBPs (aka “Total Trihalomethanes (TTHMs)” and “Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)”). Yeech!
Similar Independent Sources posts:
- Not What The Doctor Ordered: The LA Times editorial page has some extremely odd advice for the next mayor of that city. According to writer Swati Pandey, unnamed "economists and g ...
- NIMBY Visionary: We really are going to focus less on Southern California here at Independent Sources ... but this is too good to pass up. Yesterday, Los Angeles Mayor ...
- Freakonomics on “the unlikely event of a water landing…”: Anyone who's flown on an airplane whose flight path was going over water has heard the airline song and dance about “in the unlikely event of a water ...
- Just How Mean Is Santa Monica To The Homeless? #9, Baby!: When Harry Shearer signs off his weekly show from "Santa Monica, the "home of the homeless," he's not kidding. An estimated 700-1,000 people live on t ...
- Terror Scare in LA: Busted Water Main: Close call? A water main blew the other day and was big news in our neighborhood though terrorism was ultimately ruled out as there have been no young ...

January 4th, 2006 at 11:42 pm
Hypocrisy in LA City Government? That story is so old it’s ready for botox. Check out the MTD bigwigs driving around town in city-leased vehicles. They’re real proud of the system they’ve foisted on this city, but not so proud as to actually get out of their Buicks and ride a bus. And please don’t get me started on the LAUSD teachers and administrators who send their kids to private schools. They may be idiots but they’re not morons.