Mattel’s Misplaced Largess

Just a few days ago we wrote this about the University of California’s mishandling of an ethics case:
…former UC Provost M.R.C. Greenwood got a 15-month sabbatical collecting $300,000 per year plus a $100,000 research grant when she moves into her tenured professorship at UC Davis (which will pay another $163,800). As the Los Angeles Times which covered this in an editorial on the problems at UC, “we should all screw up [like this].”
It turns out if you are going to screw up, it is Mattel (Toys) where you want to do it.
According to the Los Angeles Times, Matthew Bousquette, the recently fired president of Mattel Brands, will get $5.4 million — three times his annual salary — as well as a consulting fee of $750,000 a year through the end of 2007. That’s right. Mattel chooses to fire him, presumably because he isn’t worth keeping him around but will then pay him everything in his contract anyway plus another $750,000 per year on top of that for his valuable advice. Doesn’t sound too smart–Mattel is paying him to go away and then paying him again to be around. It gets worse.
Despite getting almost $7m for doing nothing more than leaving the company Bousquette is also getting a host of perks including health benefits, outplacement services, financial counselling, tax preparation fees and country club fees. Should he at least be able to pay for his own golf? He even gets a company provided car (to drive to the golf course no doubt). The problem we have with all of this isn’t the salary or the perks or even the golf, it’s that he is getting all of these things having failed at his primary job. So much for aligning the interests of management with the stockholders. This is the part of corporate America that has to stop–paying for failure.
Mattel should know better. In 2000 they paid $50m for former CEO Jill Barad to leave so perhaps from their perspective they are getting off cheap.
Similar Independent Sources posts:
- BusinessWeek and Independent Sources Weigh in on Mattel and Barbie: BusinessWeek Reports: Mattel's second-quarter earnings look good, but worldwide sales of its iconic doll fell 1% as little girls favor interactive toy ...
- Mattel Introduces Hooker Barbie: (source, source, and source) Desperate to slow down declining Barbie sales, Mattel has taken a giant step toward Sex-Toy Barbie with the introduct ...
- Golf & Lap Dances?: Some say the two go together like chocolate and peanut butter This will certainly add to the premium people pay to have a golf course view. Stro ...
- California’s Stealth Single-Payer Health Plan: "The bill would make all California residents eligible for specified health care benefits under the California Health Insurance System, which would, o ...
- The Real Reason For The Los Angeles Times‘ Circulation Woes?: I like the Los Angeles Times. I've subscribed since I moved to Southern California twenty years ago, and I even pay about $240 / year for seven day de ...










December 30th, 2005 at 11:55 am
Barbie Dolls and Hot Wheels. I try to imagine the brainstorming sessions at a company that hasn’t had a single good idea in forty years. Marketing Guy: “How about Rock’m Sock’m Robots that compete Ultimate Fighting style, in an octagon?” Production Guy: “No way. An eight-sided mold would freak out my plastics people in Ching Lee. Plus the robots aren’t made to leave their feet.” Marketing Guy: “Oh. Well, how about a Magic Eight Ball that answers in Ebonics, you know, giving answers like “word up,” “fo’ shizzle,” and “nigga pleeze”. Bousquette: “Let me think about it more once my consulting checks start rolling in. Pass the donuts.”
January 16th, 2006 at 4:43 pm
[…] rd of directors. Tags: Entertainment, Mattel, Games Comment » Mattel’s Misplaced Larg […]