Fighting Over The Homeless Count
Rodger at 8763 Wonderland and ‘Brady Westwater’ at LAVoice.org are arguing over the oft-repeated stat that 10,000 people sleep on the streets of LA every night. This factoid just surfaced again in Steve Lopez’s pieces on Skid Row (“Roughly 10,000 people flop on skid row streets each night …”)
‘Westwater’ says
It is time we, the citizens of this city, do something about the LA Times’ inability to get even the most basic facts about our city correct.
I therefore challenge Steve Lopez to spend one night with me on Skid Row. … We will also personally count the number of people sleeping on the streets of Skid Row. … If we find anything near 10,000 people sleeping there, I will remove my blog www.lacowboy.blogspot.com from the web, issue a formal apology to the LA Times and never say another word about the LA Times, ever.
If we do not find anything near 10,000 people sleeping on the streets of Skid Row, Steve Lopez and the LA Times will issue a written apology, Steve Lopez will immediately return home to Philadelphia and he will never write another word about Los Angeles.
Rodger replied:
…the numbers are feasible. According to the Institute For The Study of Homelessness and Poverty at the Weingart Center, approximately 80,000 people are homeless each night in Los Angeles County. You know that if there were 80,000 homeless in shelters every night we would all know about it because the charitable organizations running the shelters would be screaming and pleading for financial aid.
The alternative is that the 80,000 figure is wrong. In a series of posts this summer we laid out our reasons for suspecting that the 80,000 is a significant overcount. Those posts are
June 16: LA Times: County Homeless Population Tops Two Kazillion, No Further Reporting Required
June 27: Time To Pay For The Questionable L.A. County Homeless Count
July 25: Did the L.A. Homeless Authority Overcount The Homeless? Another Motive Is Revealed …
Our reasons were
- The definition of ‘homeless’ includes working poor living in motels. They may be ‘homeless’ but they are not the people Lopez writes about.
- the 80,000 figure means that one out of every 100 LA County residents is homeless. That is way out of line with comparable counts such as San Diego (one in 305).
- A major, unexplained jump since the last count (chronically homeless reportedly increased from 7,500 to 35,000). Using San Diego as a check, we’d expect to find about 13,500.
- Why would the count be so high? Look at its provenance: the homeless census is from the LA Homeless Services Authority, whose funding is driven by … the # of homeless they count. Indeed, several weeks after the count was publicized, LA City vowed to increase LAHSA funding by $25m and county supervisors were making noises about following suit.
- LA City controller Laura Chick revealed in July that the LAHSA had a serious cash flow problem, which would only increase the pressure to boost the numbers.
Ignoring the problems with the 80,000 figure, Lopez’s 10,000 figure is surely too high.
First, let’s get the countywide and Skid Row counts straightened out. Even accepting the 80,000 countywide homeless, about 10% are estimated to be “chronically homeless” — 8,000 across the entire county. Let’s say that 25% — a huge concentration — are on Skid Row. That’s 2,000 — far more believable than the 10,000 figure so blithely vetted by the LA Times.
Indeed, the Executive Director of the LAHSA said in testimony to the US House of Representatives in 2004 that “approximately 10,000 homeless and at-risk people live in this 40 square block area.” We can’t find what percent are estimated to be at-risk versus homeless (50%? 75%?), but whatever the answer, it is something less than 10,000 — likely a lot less.
Our object isn’t to deny that a homeless problem exists, but to show that it is misunderstood, misreported, and likely exaggerated by parties with agendas to push.
The region’s largest paper — the one player that is not supposed to have an agenda — failed to question the most basic fact in Lopez’s story — the size of the problem. Repeating this in a front page story is how ‘facts’ like “10,000 on the street on Skid Row” or “80,000 homeless countywide” get stuck into the public discourse. That may dramatize a major front page series — but at what cost to the LAT’s credibility?
—
Update: see Don Garza’s comment below for excellent detail.
—
LA Times opinion columnists seem to have a low standard for the use of facts in their columns. Michael Hiltzik wrote on 9/12 of the “detention of nameless thousands of supposed terrorists at Guantanamo Bay …” The problem? Only 750 total have ever been detained there — 505 as of 8/31 plus 245 released. This figure is not disputed by human rights groups.
Technorati Tags: homeless, LA Times, LAT, Los Angeles, Los Angeles Times, steve lopez
Similar Independent Sources posts:
- Downtown L.A. Homeless Count: Lopez Kinda Comes Our Way: Last week we challenged the Los Angeles Times' Steve Lopez's contention in the opening salvo of his look at Skid Row that "roughly 10,000 people flop ...
- LA Times: County Homeless Population Tops Two Kazillion, No Further Reporting Required: In a classic example of press release journalism, the Los Angeles Times announced this morning "County Homeless Number 90,000." Why don't we believe i ...
- Time To Pay For The Questionable L.A. County Homeless Count: Two weeks ago we questioned whether Los Angeles County's new count of 90,000 homeless was inflated. We argued 1) the agency taking the count had an in ...
- Did the L.A. Homeless Authority Overcount The Homeless? Another Motive Is Revealed …: Last week Los Angeles City Controller Laura Chick released a report stating that there were serious financial problems at the Los Angeles Homeless Ser ...
- Criticism Filter Sucessfully Deployed At Los Angeles Times: An email to the LA Times Reader's Representative bounced back -- because it thought our insightful comments were SPAM! We were questioning Steve Lopez ...

October 17th, 2005 at 5:52 pm
I wouldn’t say Brady and I are fighting. I just disagree with his heavy-handed tactics toward Lopez and the LAT. This has always been a hot-button issue in L.A. (at least for as long as I can recall) and the last thing we need injected into the debate is a childish challenge to a very talented journalist.
And, as I said at Wonderland, I don’t trust most civic boosters as far as I can throw them. Just look at Noah Cross in “Chinatown” for a look at what an L.A. booster is really all about when their “charitable” and “preservationist” acts are set aside.
October 17th, 2005 at 9:27 pm
On The Third Hand I admit it, I?m a female chauvanist? Moore’s Lore Are These WiFi Concessions Necessary? Independent Sources Fighting Over The Homeless Count Kerabu Free cake, she said powered by zFeeder PagesLosing Custody of My Hope
October 17th, 2005 at 10:38 pm
Speaking of Chinatown, maybe we can get Spike Lee and come in to figure out what the real # is.
October 18th, 2005 at 12:12 am
“and at-risk people”
There it is right there. If you count those of us living in the private not for profit hotels , we are the “at risk” and you have between 2600-3000 people. These not for profits receive funding through Supernofa funding through LAHSA in SPA 1 , then you have the hotels that do not have subsidies and have not been aquired by the private not for pofits and you throw in another 1000-1500 at risk folks, I consider them to be homeless, substandard housing , by HUD definitions. Then you add those in the MIdnight mission, Fred JOrdan Mission , Los Angeles Rescue MIssion and UNion rescue Mission Every Evening , the Transitional HOuse – we call the T-HOuse , then the drop in center . You come up with . Dun dun dun. another 3500 close to 10,000 folks add the 600 to 1000 on the streets to that . You get my point.
So you have approximately 6000 people living in HOtels in Central City East and then add those in the MIssions and those on the street.
But you have to understand one thing . I live in a castle as far as I am concerned. I ahve an air conditioner , televison , wall to wall carpeting , my own restroom , I am even typoing on a computer with DSL , again I aint homeless by any means of the definition.
Don Garza
October 18th, 2005 at 9:47 am
Trying to count homeless people is like trying to count the raisins in a box of Raisin Bran. Except that homeless people aren’t in a box. Actually, I guess that some homeless people are in boxes. So I guess the only difference is that homeless people do nothing to help me poop.
October 18th, 2005 at 10:11 am
Re Rodger’s comment, I do think Lopez should be challenged on his misrepresentation of the number of on-the-streets homeless. The impression the reader is left with is that there are 10,000 people living outside in the awful conditions Lopez describes. Since the LAT does not seem to be rigorous in fact-checking its columnists (see the Hiltzik example above), and generally does not publish corrections on their work, it’s up to us in these forums (fora?) to separate hype from reality.
Re Don Garza’s comment, thanks very much for filling out the detail. It sounds like we’re talking about the real # of people on the street being 1,000 (or less; Don Garza’s calculation) to 2,000 (our different approach, with more guesswork than Garza).
December 30th, 2006 at 6:23 pm
[...] is 40 square block area.” Steve Lopez writes as if all are on the street. We posted more here.
The other number that’s frequently used — 80,000 homeless in [...]