Able Danger: Do we need a new commission?
Do we need a commission to examine the 9/11 Commission?
Moonage thinks so and argues in detail that since the 9/11 Commision’s justifications for their conclusions were based on flawed evidence, their recommendations for the security of the United States were flawed as well.
With the renewed media focus sure to result from the sentencing of Sandy Berger coming up next month, voices like Moonage, Dr. Sanity, Captain’s Quarters, Charmaine, and others will have an excellent chance to be heard.
technorati: able danger sandy berger 9/11 commission
Similar Independent Sources posts:
- Lazy LAT Reporting Abetting DOD’s Desire to Bury Able Danger: This is how the Los Angeles Times reported on Able Danger in their 8/23 article "No Evidence Atta Was Identified, Official Says": The Pentagon has ...
- Fox News Conservative? Don’t tell Barbara Boxer or Her Pocketbook: When liberals start harping about the the conservative slant of Fox News, don't expect California Senator Barbara Boxer to join in the chorus. Wh ...
- TdF: Luke’s Pre-TT Analysis: I’m writing this early Saturday morning just before the Stage 20 individual time trial. Lance locked the top podium spot long ago and the ...
- It’s Official - We Is Media: Others may call us uninformed morons but the Federal Election Committee calls us media. The Federal Election Commission announced today that it h ...
- Michael Jackson Verdict: Guilty on All Counts: Attn: Independent Sources Readers: As you probably know, competition between news outlets has been growing fiercer and fiercer. This is particul ...
August 22nd, 2005 at 10:00 am
The answer to the question is “YES!”
May 5th, 2007 at 9:37 am
[…] » Able Danger: Do we need a new commission? from Independent Sources […]