Comments on: Yahoo Surpasses Google: Then Falters in Independent Sources Performance Test http://independentsources.com/2005/08/08/yahoo-surpasses-google-then-fails-independent-sources-performance-test/ Independent thinking about California Politics, Hot Bikini Clad Teachers (Erica Chevillar), Topless Teachers (Tamara Hoover), Hot French Newscaster Melissa Theuriau, Katie Rees & the LA Times Tue, 22 Dec 2009 12:17:34 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 By: SEO Files: August 2005 Archives http://independentsources.com/2005/08/08/yahoo-surpasses-google-then-fails-independent-sources-performance-test/comment-page-1/#comment-17813 SEO Files: August 2005 Archives Sun, 11 Jun 2006 15:31:32 +0000 http://independentsources.com/?p=566#comment-17813 <!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] Yahoo Surpasses Google: Then Falters in Independent Sources Performance Test [Independent Sources] Despite the [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--> [...] Yahoo Surpasses Google: Then Falters in Independent Sources Performance Test

[Independent Sources] Despite the [...]

]]> By: Insider http://independentsources.com/2005/08/08/yahoo-surpasses-google-then-fails-independent-sources-performance-test/comment-page-1/#comment-1775 Insider Fri, 12 Aug 2005 22:41:25 +0000 http://independentsources.com/?p=566#comment-1775 Independent Sources prefers "wiki" search engines. When the results come back we modify them to suit our needs. Independent Sources prefers “wiki” search engines. When the results come back we modify them to suit our needs.

]]> By: Lou Grant http://independentsources.com/2005/08/08/yahoo-surpasses-google-then-fails-independent-sources-performance-test/comment-page-1/#comment-1642 Lou Grant Tue, 09 Aug 2005 16:37:14 +0000 http://independentsources.com/?p=566#comment-1642 Along with most of my fellow intellectuals, I search using mamma.com exclusively. Mamma utilizes patented Hegelian logic and omega string theory variables. Using your "crisis in the arctic" phrase, you came up 7th. Yahoo got it right. I'm not saying that Google is primitive, but their CTO was recently found in a cave scratching out images of wooly mammoths. Along with most of my fellow intellectuals, I search using mamma.com exclusively. Mamma utilizes patented Hegelian logic and omega string theory variables. Using your “crisis in the arctic” phrase, you came up 7th. Yahoo got it right. I’m not saying that Google is primitive, but their CTO was recently found in a cave scratching out images of wooly mammoths.

]]> By: RAWbservations http://independentsources.com/2005/08/08/yahoo-surpasses-google-then-fails-independent-sources-performance-test/comment-page-1/#comment-1721 RAWbservations Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000 http://independentsources.com/?p=566#comment-1721 <!--%kramer-pre%-->up on Google has plummetted in recent weeks. It may well be that I've just become irrelevent, but Yahoo has a much wider net. As for looking for things that are not my name? Seeing as how the world revolves around me, I'm not sure that's relevent. [ source ] [0cmts]  <!--%kramer-post--> up on Google has plummetted in recent weeks. It may well be that I’ve just become irrelevent, but Yahoo has a much wider net. As for looking for things that are not my name? Seeing as how the world revolves around me, I’m not sure that’s relevent. [ source ] [0cmts]  

]]> By: IP Weblog http://independentsources.com/2005/08/08/yahoo-surpasses-google-then-fails-independent-sources-performance-test/comment-page-1/#comment-3741 IP Weblog Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000 http://independentsources.com/?p=566#comment-3741 <!--%kramer-pre%-->wat dieper op de materie ingaat is Charlene Li in haar blog. Zij deed onder meer een paar testjes, waaruit Google wat het aantal werkelijk getoonde resultaten betreft, met meer treffers te voorschijn kwam dan Yahoo!. Een andere testje werd gedaan door Independent Sources . Mijn eigen indruk is dat Google nog altijd groter is dan Yahoo!. In baseer die indruk op een testje dat ik zelf heb gedaan. Ziehier twaalf vragen die een zo laag resultaat opleveren dat (doorgaans) ook de laatste treffer nog kan worden bekeken.<!--%kramer-post--> wat dieper op de materie ingaat is Charlene Li in haar blog. Zij deed onder meer een paar testjes, waaruit Google wat het aantal werkelijk getoonde resultaten betreft, met meer treffers te voorschijn kwam dan Yahoo!. Een andere testje werd gedaan door Independent Sources . Mijn eigen indruk is dat Google nog altijd groter is dan Yahoo!. In baseer die indruk op een testje dat ik zelf heb gedaan. Ziehier twaalf vragen die een zo laag resultaat opleveren dat (doorgaans) ook de laatste treffer nog kan worden bekeken.

]]>