<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yahoo Surpasses Google: Then Falters in Independent Sources Performance Test</title>
	<link>http://independentsources.com/2005/08/08/yahoo-surpasses-google-then-fails-independent-sources-performance-test/</link>
	<description>Independent thinking about  California Politics, Hot Bikini Clad Teachers (Erica Chevillar), Topless Teachers (Tamara Hoover), Hot French Newscaster Melissa Theuriau, Katie Rees  &#038; the LA Times</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 01:17:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: SEO Files: August 2005 Archives</title>
		<link>http://independentsources.com/2005/08/08/yahoo-surpasses-google-then-fails-independent-sources-performance-test/#comment-17813</link>
		<author>SEO Files: August 2005 Archives</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jun 2006 15:31:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://independentsources.com/2005/08/08/yahoo-surpasses-google-then-fails-independent-sources-performance-test/#comment-17813</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] Yahoo Surpasses Google: Then Falters in Independent Sources Performance Test  &#13;&#10;[Independent Sources] Despite the [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[&#8230;] Yahoo Surpasses Google: Then Falters in Independent Sources Performance Test</p>
<p> &#13;&#10;[Independent Sources] Despite the [&#8230;]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Insider</title>
		<link>http://independentsources.com/2005/08/08/yahoo-surpasses-google-then-fails-independent-sources-performance-test/#comment-1775</link>
		<author>Insider</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2005 22:41:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://independentsources.com/2005/08/08/yahoo-surpasses-google-then-fails-independent-sources-performance-test/#comment-1775</guid>
		<description>Independent Sources prefers "wiki" search engines. When the results come back we modify them to suit our needs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Independent Sources prefers &#8220;wiki&#8221; search engines. When the results come back we modify them to suit our needs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lou Grant</title>
		<link>http://independentsources.com/2005/08/08/yahoo-surpasses-google-then-fails-independent-sources-performance-test/#comment-1642</link>
		<author>Lou Grant</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2005 16:37:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://independentsources.com/2005/08/08/yahoo-surpasses-google-then-fails-independent-sources-performance-test/#comment-1642</guid>
		<description>Along with most of my fellow intellectuals, I search using mamma.com exclusively.  Mamma utilizes patented Hegelian logic and omega string theory variables.  Using your "crisis in the arctic" phrase, you came up 7th.  Yahoo got it right.  I'm not saying that Google is primitive, but their CTO was recently found in a cave scratching out images of wooly mammoths.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Along with most of my fellow intellectuals, I search using mamma.com exclusively.  Mamma utilizes patented Hegelian logic and omega string theory variables.  Using your &#8220;crisis in the arctic&#8221; phrase, you came up 7th.  Yahoo got it right.  I&#8217;m not saying that Google is primitive, but their CTO was recently found in a cave scratching out images of wooly mammoths.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RAWbservations</title>
		<link>http://independentsources.com/2005/08/08/yahoo-surpasses-google-then-fails-independent-sources-performance-test/#comment-1721</link>
		<author>RAWbservations</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://independentsources.com/2005/08/08/yahoo-surpasses-google-then-fails-independent-sources-performance-test/#comment-1721</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt;up on Google has plummetted in recent weeks. It may well be that I've just become irrelevent, but Yahoo has a much wider net. As for looking for things that are not my name? Seeing as how the world revolves around me, I'm not sure that's relevent. [ source ] [0cmts]   &lt;!--%kramer-post--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-pre%-->up on Google has plummetted in recent weeks. It may well be that I&#8217;ve just become irrelevent, but Yahoo has a much wider net. As for looking for things that are not my name? Seeing as how the world revolves around me, I&#8217;m not sure that&#8217;s relevent. [ source ] [0cmts]   <!--%kramer-post--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IP Weblog</title>
		<link>http://independentsources.com/2005/08/08/yahoo-surpasses-google-then-fails-independent-sources-performance-test/#comment-3741</link>
		<author>IP Weblog</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://independentsources.com/2005/08/08/yahoo-surpasses-google-then-fails-independent-sources-performance-test/#comment-3741</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt;wat dieper op de materie ingaat is Charlene Li in haar blog. Zij deed onder meer een paar testjes, waaruit Google wat het aantal werkelijk getoonde resultaten betreft, met meer treffers te voorschijn kwam dan Yahoo!. Een andere testje werd gedaan door Independent Sources . Mijn eigen indruk is dat Google nog altijd groter is dan Yahoo!. In baseer die indruk op een testje dat ik zelf heb gedaan. Ziehier twaalf vragen die een zo laag resultaat opleveren dat (doorgaans) ook de laatste treffer nog kan worden bekeken.&lt;!--%kramer-post--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-pre%-->wat dieper op de materie ingaat is Charlene Li in haar blog. Zij deed onder meer een paar testjes, waaruit Google wat het aantal werkelijk getoonde resultaten betreft, met meer treffers te voorschijn kwam dan Yahoo!. Een andere testje werd gedaan door Independent Sources . Mijn eigen indruk is dat Google nog altijd groter is dan Yahoo!. In baseer die indruk op een testje dat ik zelf heb gedaan. Ziehier twaalf vragen die een zo laag resultaat opleveren dat (doorgaans) ook de laatste treffer nog kan worden bekeken.<!--%kramer-post--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.796 seconds -->
