“How Many Government Agencies Does it Take to Screw in a Light Bulb?”
It almost sounds like a corny joke, “how many government agencies does it take to screw in a light bulb?” Here is a hint, it took 15 years for 160 street lamps in downtown Los Angeles to be lit up after their installation. How could this possibly happen? Well, in Bright Idea Finally Shines in L.A. as reported in the Los Angeles Times it was a case of classic government bureaucracy.
The lamps were installed as part of a beautification project in 1990. Transportation officials spent $250,000 to install them and new sidewalk curbstones and street-side trees to compensate for three years of neighborhood upheaval caused by subway construction.
Over the next 15 years the Los Angeles County Transportation Commission, which had commissioned the decorative lamps, morphed into the Metropolitan Transportation Authority. City Hall administrations came and went.
The original plan called for the owners of seven properties next to the lights to pay for the electricity but in true government fashion this was never done and for more than 5,300 nights in a row after that, the 18-foot-tall decorative lighting fixtures failed to come on at sunset. Some lay blame on the city-prepared contract was too toughly worded for the property owners.
“It was a total nightmare. It was my first experience with city bureaucracy, and it was really scary. After two years of trying to get the lights on I had to say sorry, we can’t do it,” recalled Carol Schatz, president a downtown business group who attempted 15 years ago to serve as a go-between between the landowners and the city.
Here is the real funny part. Ballots will soon be sent to the property owners where the lights are asking if they are willing to pay the estimated $9,000 annual bill for electricity and maintenance. If they say no, the city will have pay for the lights and poles to be removed.
So in summary, taxpayers paid $250,000 to install lamps even though no agreement had been made as to whether anyone wanted the lamps enough to pay their ongoing electricity costs. When a contract was prepared by the city, after the fact, it wasn’t anything that property owner wanted to sign. So the lights sat for 15 years before finally getting turned on. However if the owners of the affected properties don’t agree to pick-up ongoing costs, taxpayers will once again foot the bill—this time to pull them out.
Now someone needs to explain to me how government provided health care is going to work.
Similar Independent Sources posts:
- Amtrak: Taking Taxpayers for a Ride: Over the past 30 years, taxpayers have pumped over $30 billion into subsidizing Amtrak--a system that was supposed to be self-sustaining by the early ...
- Weekend Edition: “Solar” Must Not Mean What I Thought It Did: From this weekend's Home Depot flyer in the Los Angles Times: Hmmm, so if these "solar" lights are powered by AA batteries, I guess I already h ...
- 70,000 Coors Lights Story Update and a license plate cops must love: Kroach.com enjoyed our story on the guy from Utah who drank 70,000 Coors Lights and never tossed out a can and did us one better by posting the pictur ...
- Not What The Doctor Ordered: The LA Times editorial page has some extremely odd advice for the next mayor of that city. According to writer Swati Pandey, unnamed "economists and g ...
- Lockyer Files Papers Opposing Kelo-type Taking In Kern County: The reaction against the Supreme Court's Kelo decision has reached Southern California. From the SF Chronicle: In a move that suggests the use of emi ...










June 6th, 2005 at 10:29 am
See also this article on a clinic in South LA, an area without a normal hospital:
“Paul Zwerdling, an accountant and attorney whose father used to be a schoolteacher in South-Central, has been trying to help them (the doctor and nurse who founded the clinic) with the banks and bureaucrats, particularly with some of the knuckleheads at City Hall.
Construction cost estimates have risen while they await city approval. Zwerdling became convinced Hannah and Singleton needed to make a few hefty campaign donations in order to get things moving.
But even if they were so inclined, they’re tapped out after sinking every penny into the clinic and maxing out credit cards.
“The city says 50% of the wall space has to be windows,” Zwerdling complains — a bonehead requirement that will drive up the cost of the new building and make things a little awkward for patients. “You’ll have women up in stirrups in front of a big picture window.”
The neighborhood is full of eyesores and code violations, Hannah and Zwerdling point out, including burned-out buildings that sit untouched. So why would city officials become sticklers for aesthetic detail and make life all the more difficult for people trying to do good work?”
January 12th, 2006 at 3:51 pm
[…] Talk about hubris!Somewhere along the way, the government (who can’t even turn on a light bulb), thinks that it can be a […]