The Economist, 5/28/2005, reviewing the book “Mao: The Unknown Story”:

“Mao, it seems, was utterly contemptuous of the downtrodden masses whose savior the Party proclaimed itself to be.”

The Los Angeles Times, Friday, announcing that big-time Democratic contributor David Geffen has to allow non-billionaires near his house:

(On Thursday) coastal-access advocates set foot on the sand at Tinseltown titan David Geffen’s sprawling beachfront estate … celebrating the opening of a 9-foot-wide public pathway to the ocean. Creation of the walkway came after Geffen reluctantly made good on a 22-year-old legal promise to let the public onto part of Carbon Beach, a mile-long stretch of sand east of the Malibu Pier. The public will have access to the path as well as most of the beach in front of the Geffen estate. … (Geffen) pledged in 1983 to open a public pathway to the beach in exchange for Coastal Commission permission to build his Cape Cod-style compound across several beachfront lots.

Which side of Al Gore’s “The people versus the powerful” did Geffen come down on again?

[PS: Geffen reimbursed the State of California and Access for All, a nonprofit, $300,000 for legal fees they incurred in the fight to open the pathway]

Technorati Tags: Southern California

This entry was posted on Tuesday, May 31st, 2005 at 4:00 am by A Senior Administration Official and is filed under Brilliant, but uncategorizable, California Schemin', Funny ... to us. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.